Around after noon on that fateful day, I got a text message from my producer that Charlie had been shot. I immediately left, got in the car, and went to the hospital to check on his condition. We were hearing all kinds of news—some said he was on life support, others said he was stable. From the video of the shooting, I knew he wasn’t going to make it, but like everyone else, I hoped he would. We all did.
I went down to the hospital; I saw people who had followed the car to the hospital, praying out loud and holding hands — it was a sight that would move anyone to tears. At that point I heard from someone I was texting with that Charlie was dead. I’ve never been a follower of Charlie Kirk, but I liked him and supported what he said.
After his death I got to know his work even more, and I realized that Charlie was a larger-than-life figure — the leader this country needed, the leader young people needed — and he was a threat to dark forces who want to plunge this country and the world into darkness. They think they have won. No, my friends — Make no mistake: this is far from over. Losing a brave voice is a huge setback, not the end. The fight for our country’s future continues — clearer, angrier, and more determined. Those who thought this would silence us have badly misjudged what comes next.
We will not let this nation become the playground of globalist elites or the instrument of intelligence agencies that answer to shadowed interests. Not now, not ever.
After analyzing everything, my conclusion is simple: this was not the act of violence by a random man from Utah. Robinson is a patsy, just like Sirhan Sirhan and Ali Agca. Did Sirhan fire the gun? Yes. Did Agca attempt to assassinate the pope? Yes. Were they the masterminds behind it all? No. In fact, they were victims of a larger system. What I am about to tell you next is factual and true — please read carefully; by the end of this article I will try to explain why they wanted Charlie dead and who maybe behind this.
Right after World War II, America wasn’t just celebrating the victory the Soviets had secured. Its intelligence agencies were already gearing up for the Cold War and for global influence, and a new kind of fear began to circulate — fueled by propaganda from British and U.S. intelligence agencies. The threat, they suggested, wasn’t tanks or bombs but the mind. Claims spread that Koreans had mastered mind control and that they were using it on American soldiers. There was no shred of evidence, no credible story, to back any of those claims. They were myths conceived and amplified by intelligence services in the U.S. and Britain.
After World War II, the U.S. brought a number of former Nazi scientists to America and placed them in influential roles within its intelligence apparatus. The CIA learned from them that extreme psychological methods could potentially be used to control the human mind. The CIA, an agency that thrives on operating in moral gray zones, was naturally drawn to the possibility of mind control, despite its deeply unethical nature. As Yuval Noah Harari has told us, humans have become “hackable” animals (He seemed almost to relish saying it). And disturbingly, he wasn’t wrong.
After the Korean War, stories about U.S. prisoners of war being “brainwashed” began circulating deliberately , and they were false. The CIA used those stories to justify its own brainwashing programs, such as MKUltra. This is a familiar tactic: when an agency wants to carry out something harmful, illegal, or despicable, it points to alleged Soviet (Now Russian) or foreign wrongdoing as a pretext for mirror actions. Claims about Soviet cancer-weapon research, for example, were used as a pretext for pursuing similar programs here, despite the lack of proof that the Soviets had initiated such work.
Mind control programs captivated British intelligence and the CIA. The CIA resolved to master it and began running covert, illegal programs. Many know the outline of this history, but many who think they know the story they really don’t. MK Ultra had sister operations a lot of them. The man put in charge of those efforts was Sidney Gottlieb, a chemist. Outwardly he looked like an ordinary scientist, but inside the CIA he became known as the man willing to try almost anything to break down and rebuild the human mind. His obsession became LSD. At the time, few people knew about the drug, but the CIA regarded it as a potential miracle: perhaps it could coax secrets from a subject; perhaps it could erase a personality entirely.
We later learned that LSD by itself was not sufficient, but when paired with other torture techniques it could and did — produce powerful, damaging effects. The agency began testing it on CIA employees, soldiers, prisoners, psychiatric patients, and sometimes random civilians who had no idea what was being done to them.
They slipped LSD into people’s drinks, food, or gave it to them disguised as medicine. Sometimes they’d sit back and watch behind a one-way mirror as the person completely lost it. There are stories of people running out of buildings in terror, convinced monsters were chasing them.
With LSD They tried hypnosis, sensory deprivation tanks, sleep deprivation, electric shocks, basically anything that might mess with a person’s mind enough to see if they could control it, and they were successful. Some of the worst stuff happened in prisons and mental hospitals, where people didn’t have the power to say no. In Canada, at McGill University, patients went in for depression or anxiety and ended up being drugged into comas and blasted with recorded messages over and over, sometimes for weeks. A lot of them were never the same again.
The whole thing was super secret. Even inside the CIA many did not know what was happening. And then in 1973, when the Watergate scandal broke Gottlieb ordered most of the MKUltra MK Naomi and other sister operation files to be destroyed. Tens of thousands of pages were shredded, gone forever. We don’t even know how many people fell victim to this and how far it went.
Some paperwork survived, and in the mid-1970s, Congress held hearings. The truth started leaking out. Families came forward, like the family of Frank Olson, Who worked with the CIA - a government scientist who had been secretly dosed with LSD and ended up falling (or maybe pushed) out of a New York hotel window.
In the end, it came out that MKUltra wasn’t just one project, they had 149 different sub-projects running under the same idea. Universities, hospitals, prisons, and even front companies were tied into it, usually without knowing what the CIA was really up to.
They took these operations internationally, they were doing the same in France, Germany, Bulgaria and many more countries. This is important because what I will explain next will not be easy to comprehend. The official line is that the project ended in 1973, but so much evidence was destroyed that the full story remains unknown. That was not only one program, there were many others. What happened to those projects? What exactly did they learn, and how far did the experiments go? My view is that they learned a great deal and were highly successful in developing Manchurian candidates, nearly to perfection. I will provide the facts and evidence that support this claim. To grasp the extent of MKUltra and how deep it ran, you also need to understand Operation Gladio and its usefulness to the CIA overseas.
OPERATION GLADIO
NATO, along with the CIA and Britain’s MI6, set up secret “stay-behind” armies. The story fed to European leaders at the time was simple and fear-driven: they were told that, now that the Soviets had won the ground war against the Nazis, Europe should fear a Soviet takeover. In reality, this was a complete lie. The Soviets were exhausted, having lost 27 million people—an immense loss of lives, which I personally view as a form of ethnic cleansing orchestrated by global powers. Twenty-seven million people, some brilliant minds, patriots, some just usual people and those who loved their country—were consumed in a human meat grinder. With such devastation, no country could realistically wage another war, particularly in Europe or with the UK who would definitely fight on the European side. The CIA knew this they are not stupid, yet the lie was persuasive, and some believed it. As a result, Operation Gladio was successfully implemented, and U.S. intelligence managed to leave behind miniature armies ready to act.
This entire hidden project was given the codename Gladio, which means “sword” in Italian. Italy was one of the main hubs, but similar secret groups emerged all over Western Europe—Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Turkey, you name it. Each country had its own version, loosely connected under NATO’s secret planning committees. Turkey was another key location due to its geopolitical importance.
Over time, some of these stay-behind networks - they began turning their attention inward, targeting the citizens of the countries their were in. They aligned with gangsters, used them to destabilize countries from within, and, in many cases, helped overthrow leaders whom the U.S. and UK did not support. In Italy, for example, the Gladio network became entwined in what’s known as the “Years of Lead” (1960s–1980s), a period marked by bombings, assassinations, and violent clashes between the far left and the far right.
The most infamous case was the 1980 Bologna train station bombing,which killed 85 people. Officially, it was blamed on far-right extremists, but over the years, evidence and testimony suggested that elements connected to Gladio (particularly the US stay behind network) had a role. The theory was that by staging or allowing brutal terrorist attacks, they could blame the left, scare the public, and push politics in their direction. This became known as the “strategy of tension.”
Other countries had their own shady episodes. In Belgium during the 1980s, a series of bizarre supermarket massacres were carried out by unknown gunmen and were never fully solved. Many politicians and journalists linked these attacks to the Gladio networks, but their warnings were often dismissed as “crazy” or “delusional,” as tends to happen. These people couldn’t speak freely, yet they revealed just enough to connect the attacks to Operation Gladio. Even though no one was ever held accountable, their revelations were enough to start waking the public up to the network’s existence.
A Belgian parliamentary inquiry into the Brabant Killings suggested that elements within the Belgian military and gendarmerie might have been involved with operation Gladio also they could not fully prove it. In Switzerland it was called P-26, while in Belgium it was known as SDRA-8. No one was ever held accountable for Operation Gladio and the equivalent secret programs elsewhere. Remember that many of these operations were set up by the CIA and MI6, and were built on deception, fear, and corruption.
In each country the local intelligence services secretly worked with the CIA and MI6 to run these clandestine “armies.” When news of Operation Gladio broke, the Belgian defense minister traveled to Italy to confront Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti. He asked, “Why would you allow such a force to exist in your country? It’s dangerous, you’re effectively ceding power to foreign intelligence agencies.” Andreotti replied that the situation was bad, but then turned around and said: You asking me why? You also have a secret army. The Belgian defense minister was surprised and responded that he was the defense minister and would have heard if such a force existed. Andreotti advised him to speak with his chief of staff.
Back in Belgium, the minister grilled his chief of staff and learned the truth: a secret army had indeed been created in Belgium as well, and coordinated with the CIA and MI6. He was absolutely shocked. When he demanded an explanation, a senior military officer said: Why should we tell you anything about this? You’re only a politician; politicians come and go, we stay. The audacity of this unelected military man was very troubling, and it illustrated the way such services treat elected officials and even heads of state. If you think the Belgian example is troubling, consider that similar attitude on steroids in the US that is what we are facing today. The same dynamic occurred in Switzerland. The defense minister at the time was Georges-André Chevallaz, and the head of P-26 was Colonel Efrem Cattelan. When asked why the defense minister had not been informed, Cattelan answered that there was no need to tell him.
Operations similar to these large-scale undertakings are usually well funded and hard to ignore. How, then, were these groups funded and supplied in secret? They were heavily armed literally “armed to the teeth.” They possessed bombs, ammunition, communications gear, and other weapons; similar equipment was provided to stay-behind units across multiple countries. The costs were hidden within miscellaneous military budgets and infrastructure projects, and finance officials within the governments who worked covertly to bury the expenditures. Without that internal financial support, the programs could not have been maintained. The CIA’s covert “black money” also played a role—a complex topic in its own right.
Where were those weapons hidden? In Italy some were concealed in cemeteries; in Switzerland some were hidden in the Alps. Investigators later discovered weapons and documented them as evidence. Behind closed doors, NATO ambassadors held secret meetings; according to one Italian ambassador at that time who took part in secret meetings said: these armies and their weapons were even used to carry out terrorist attacks in Italy. For example, some researchers and inquiries have linked certain post-war bombings and destabilization campaigns to the activities or context of the Gladio networks.
These stay-behind forces were allegedly used to destabilize countries, eliminate leaders, in some cases install friendly governments, and sometimes to stage attacks that could be blamed on the Soviet Union, thereby manufacturing a convenient enemy and shaping public opinion. In Turkey, the stay-behind forces morphed into what became known as the Turkish “Deep State” parts of the military and intelligence world working with organized crime and nationalist militias.
For decades, all of this was denied. Politicians called it conspiracy theory. But then in 1990, Italy’s Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti stood before Parliament and admitted that Gladio was real. Documents came out, hearings were held, and suddenly the whole thing wasn’t just rumor anymore. NATO and the CIA admitted the networks existed but insisted they were only for defense against Soviet invasion — nothing more. But after the soviet union was gone no-one bothered to admit why certain parts of the operation continued.
Still, the fact remains: a secret army, funded and supported by Western intelligence, had been hiding inside democratic countries for decades. And in some cases, people connected to those networks were mixed up in violence and terrorism against their own citizens. This is a fact!
After the revelations, some of the networks were dismantled, others simply faded away, and some have remained operational. This whole situation left a deep scar, especially in Italy and Turkey.
Why is this important? Because today we’re going to examine MK-Ultra, its global reach, and its connection to Charlie Kirk. As I mentioned, MK-Ultra had sister projects overseas with similar objectives. France was heavily affected, as were Turkey and Italy. Let’s focus on Turkey, which is particularly significant.
Turkey’s “stay-behind” network under Gladio was called Counter-Guerrilla. Established in the early 1950s under NATO coordination, it trained ultranationalist paramilitaries—such as the Grey Wolves, with support from the CIA and U.S. Special Forces. The CIA not only trained these groups in combat but also experimented on them using torture tactics.
One member of the Grey Wolves was Mehmet Ali Ağca, the young Turkish nationalist who attempted to assassinate Pope John Paul II on May 13, 1981. The Pope survived, and later visited Ağca in prison. He wanted to tell him that he forgave him. According to two separate sources, Ağca told the Pope directly: “How are you alive? I shot you exactly as I was supposed to.”
Why would Ağca attempt to kill the Pope? He had no personal motive. Over time, he gave multiple, often contradictory explanations. People dismissed him as crazy, yet when speaking about anything else, he appeared perfectly normal. Only when discussing the assassination attempt did he become incoherent, unable to form sentences properly and told us multiple different versions. He even visited the Pope’s grave after leaving prison. His actions strongly suggests he acted under programming.
We know Ağca was connected to Turkey’s Gladio network, and we also know the CIA supplied torture manuals, such as the KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Manual (1963)—to Turkish security services. These manuals explicitly detailed techniques like:
Sensory deprivation
Drug administration (sedatives, hallucinogens)
Sleep manipulation
Hypnosis
Psychological trauma to “break down” prisoners
Survivors of Turkish military prisons in the 1970s–80s described being:
Drugged during interrogations
Hypnotized
Subjected to isolation chambers and electroshock
Forced into repeated cycles of sleep deprivation and hypnosis-like suggestion
These methods closely mirrored operation - ARTICHOKE/MK-Ultratechniques. Why would the CIA want to kill the Pope? That’s a complex story I explore in my other works, but here’s a brief version: The CIA, in collaboration with the Italian Mafia, particularly the Magliana gang in Italy, was laundering money through the Vatican Bank to fund the political organization Solidarity in Poland. The Pope was polish and at first he thought he would be helping his country allowing this. But when the Pope resisted and attempted to thwart this operation, the CIA tried to assassinate him using Ağca (A possible subject of mind control victim). When that failed and the Pope survived, they resorted to blackmail, including the kidnapping of Emanuela Orlandi, a young girl whose family worked closely with the Pope.
The point is this: the mind control programs were real and effective. Even today, Ali Ağca cannot explain why he shot the Pope. Does he sound like a man with a clear, personal motive to kill the Pope? No. He was programmed.
Now, let’s talk about Sirhan Sirhan. For those who may not remember, Sirhan is the man who shot Robert Kennedy and supposedly killed him. Sirhan never denied being there; in fact, he always said he was present. He even remembers being there after the act, recalling how people were laying on him, almost choking him to death. What he does not remember is firing the gun or killing RFK.
Investigators recovered a notebook in which one phrase was written over and over: “RFK must die.” Sirhan admitted that it looked like his handwriting but said, “I don’t remember ever writing it.” It’s not hard to figure out why both Ali and Sihan have memory lapses in exactly similar situations, even though they have no problem with memory in general, when it comes to everything else. Sirhan had no reason to lie, he was on camera and facing life in prison. There was no incentive to mislead about something so minor. His statement was genuine. If anyone is a clear example of what mind control looks like, Sirhan takes the prize.
Here’s something particularly interesting: Sirhan was Palestinian, at a time when Israel needed to maintain a positive image. Suddenly, a Palestinian national kills RFK. Ali Ağca was Turkish, a Muslim from an Islamic country, trying to kill a Christian Pope. If I were trying to create division in the world, how would I do it? Perhaps exactly the way the CIA and MI6 chose to orchestrate these events.
Then, of course, we have the case of Crooks, and to this day, we know almost nothing about him. When Charlie’s situation first emerged, I said on my show: just wait, they will present the same narrative as Crooks: some scorned kid, radicalized in the basement of his parents’ house, deciding to “pay back.” I said this long before they identified Tyler Robinson, and, unsurprisingly, I was right.
Even though nothing about his case makes sense, the media continues to push the same story over and over. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tyler Robinson actually fired the gun, that’s not what concerns me. What matters is who brainwashed him to do it. Was it through computer games? Online chats, which these agencies are fully capable of manipulating.
If so why Tyler? Why him? How did they pick him? That, my friends, is the easiest part. Do you know how you get on the radar of the CIA or NSA? Do you know how it happens most of the time? It happens in college or school. They look for exceptional students for whatever purpose. Tyler Robinson’s exceptional academic performance was highlighted by his top 1% ranking on college entrance exams, which earned him a prestigious four-year scholarship to Utah State University. He was in the special 1%.
Now, I can tell you that gets the attention of the agencies, whether it’s the NSA or the CIA. I’m not saying he was recruited, absolutely not, but I am saying he definitely would have been noticed for his capabilities (If someone was looking). Now, pair that with the fact that the kid had no life. What a great candidate he would have made. You want programmable but smart after all they have a role to play. Just saying…
Other questions arise: Did he fire the right gun, or was someone else present to finish the job while Robinson was merely a distraction. Why, in the footage we have, does Tyler Robinson lay prone on the roof possibly to shoot Charlie, but as soon as a shot is fired, he runs without the gun. Another video clearly shows him running immediately after the shot. So when did he supposedly disassemble the gun? According to the footage, he did not. He could not have. Where was the gun while he ran across the roof?
And if, by some miracle, he did manage to disassemble it and put it in his backpack while jumping off the roof, why would he then take the time to reassemble it just to hide it in the bushes? Wouldn’t it be far easier to hide the disassembled pieces than to waste time reassembling the weapon and then hide it? You would think a student as smart as he was would have probably thought about that. At this point, it’s almost insulting how stupid they seem to think we are.
Now, let’s talk about who and why. There’s a lot to unpack here. Charlie was a threat for the deep state for many reasons. He didn’t belong to anyone—he was a free bird, a free fighter for the United States of America. He was a Trump supporter and played a role in helping Donald Trump rise to power. He was also a supporter of Israel for some time. Trump has made several controversial moves regarding Israel. When I mention Israel, it’s important to understand that Israel cannot be taken as a fully sovereign entity—it isn’t. Israel was created by the same people who helped establish the CIA, MI6, and the NSA. Israel is not a country in the traditional sense; it is a tool to maintain power in the Middle East for the purposes of global influence.
Jewish people, historically and systematically, have been manipulated by the same elites who are by the way - some Jewish and some Anglo-Saxon. They were manipulated into believing that the world constantly threatens them. This sense of victimhood makes them highly controllable. Imagine creating a group that identifies exclusively as an underdog, perpetually hated by the world, and then telling them not to worry—they are special, God said so.
Now you have created a beast full of anger, entitlement, and brainwashing, and then you put them on someone else’s land, where they are constantly reminded of old wounds and told they don’t belong. But then you tell them, of course they belong, because thousands of years ago it was their land. You play on the wounds of the past and the new entitlement of how they are special, and you end up with the most indoctrinated nation, full of hate toward people who have done nothing against them.
Then you put the CIA’s creation, Mossad, in charge of them, and you have a cocktail of misery and chaos. The CIA created Mossad; funny enough, they also created German intelligence and many others(That in a different article). This is why Mossad and the CIA work hand in hand when it comes to the darkest criminal operations. The CIA at some level still has to answer, at least to Congress and the people, while Mossad is absolutely out of control and answers to no one. This is why it makes the best parter for the CIA. That is why the CIA prefers to outsource the dark black operations to Mossad and present themselves as cleaner agency not even to delude you but to delude their own people.
This partnership is not unique; it is similar to the Gladio networks. It is global, allowing the CIA to sit back and watch as their agenda is executed by a third party, giving them plausible deniability. This is why so many European leaders make decisions that clearly harm their own countries, baffling everyone who wonders why they act against their own interests. But it’s not hard to figure out. Just as Trump is wary of his own intelligence agencies, so are these European leaders—they fear ending up dead, in jail, or worse.
This is a global network operating with the same script in every country, and no leader has been able to overpower them. Those who tried ended up dead. Charlie has fallen victim to the same exact forces.
So why Charlie? They tried with Trump. They tried to kill him—it didn’t work. Then the strategy changed, and they began lying to him instead of killing him, and on many occasions, it worked. But Trump is old, and he will be out soon. People like Charlie are young, promising, and effective—most importantly, effective!!! They will continue to help others like Trump succeed, educating young crowds and connecting with them face to face. Charlie became too big. If you still doubt it, look around! The world is talking about him—not just the U.S. People in Korea, Russia, and many other countries are crying for him. This is a threat to this network, they wanted to kill freedom and send a message to Trump that he must fall in line and people.
While Charlie supported Israel, he didn’t really understand the severity and corruption of the country’s government. They used him for support, but once Charlie started asking questions about Israel, Mossad and Netanyahu - he became dangerous to them and the danger to the CIA as I said it is the same crowd. Charlie had the support of a young generation; he was too big. If Charlie turned on them, it would have created huge problems for Israel. It was very clear they were losing him.
Let me explain the connection between Israel and the CIA. If Americans people were to stop supporting Israel stop believing it’s special statues, Congress would be forced to reconsider the amount of aid and support the country receives—aid that is crucial for the CIA’s influence in the Middle East, and not just the Middle East, but globally. Without a strong Israel, globalist intelligence networks would lose significant leverage worldwide. It’s as simple as that. Imagine if Israel disappeared tomorrow: the first institutions to lose influence would be the CIA and MI6, because their power in the region depends entirely on Israel being strong. It is not the Jewish people who are expanding at the expense of Gaza; it is central intelligence that is consolidating power—nothing more.
Why Israel matters for the CIA strategically:
The U.S. has very few stable allies in the region as they destabilized everyone in pursuit of power. Israel serves as a secure base of influence in an area that has historically been wealthy but not aligned with U.S. interests. Israel allows elites to project power and maintain a presence near critical chokepoints—the Suez Canal, Red Sea, and Persian Gulf, which are vital for global trade and energy routes. While this could be managed through fair trade agreements and diplomacy, the U.S. and the elites do not operate that way. They want it all.
During the Cold War, most Arab states leaned toward the Soviet Union—not because the Soviets were exceptional, but because they offered better deals and did not threaten to overthrow or assassinate leaders. In contrast, Israel, firmly aligned with the U.S. became Washington’s primary outpost in the region, a creation of the elites. While Israel is not a major oil producer, its strategic location gives it control over trade routes connecting Europe, Asia, and Africa. Without Israel, certain bankers and intelligence networks would have to work twice as hard to achieve their objectives. This is about power and control—nothing more.
It is remarkably easy to gain political support for Israel. Politicians only need to be reminded of Israel’s importance as an ally, while conveniently leaving out the fact that Israel is essentially a state created and managed by intelligence agencies. Its success benefits American corporations, not the American people, but few in Congress ever dig into that detail or go that deep. All you have to do is frame Israel as vital for U.S. influence in the Middle East, which honestly can be replaceable, there are many other ways to do this. Israel is not the only option but it is the easiest option for the CIA. So offer political incentives, money and the support by congress follows. Nobody questions how the secret intelligence networks gain power, or how redirecting American taxpayer money toward Israel—and away from domestic development—is problematic somehow that is not interesting for our politicians. That discussion is conveniently ignored.
When Charlie came out questioning U.S. aid to Israel and Jeffrey Epstein situation it was a direct hit to both the CIA and Mossad. Epstein was a joint operation by both agencies. It was a huge blow to Israel and intelligence networks, and they would not forgive it. I think they decided Charlie was worth more dead than alive, because if he was dead that they could control the narrative after his death, which they did immediately.
Netanyahu pushed his post about Charlie faster than mainstream media could, then booked himself on prime-time television to talk about what a big friend he was to Charlie, lied about the letter Charlie wrote him, and, of course, the rest of the CIA-influenced media fell in line. Now they can fake the narrative that Charlie was a devoted Israeli supporter to the end and blame the left entirely. This further divides the country—the exact opposite of what Charlie wanted. It is truly disgusting. Again what is good for the CIA is good for Israel and vice versa. And some may say, “But why kill him in public like that? They could have poisoned him. They could have killed him with a heart attack.” Yes, all true—but if that’s the question you’re asking, then you still don’t understand how intelligence agencies operate at all.
They don’t just get rid of a problem—they aim for the scenario that gives them the most impact from a single action. For example, the division of a nation. If Charlie had suffered a heart attack or had been secretly poisoned, we would not be witnessing the division and hate we see now between the two parties and their followers blaming each other. Then who would get the message—Trump, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, or others—to shut up and fall in line? To stop speaking the truth? This is an attempt to divide, to send a message and scare others like him, and to kill freedom. That is how they operate. That is why the assassination was public.
So what can we do? First, we have to follow what Charlie was saying we need to do: we must not allow division, we must pursue the path of Christ, and we must love one another despite our differences. We must never stop the conversation and never cower to pressure from the government or any entity.
Second, we need to dismantle and investigate the NSA and the CIA. Once these two are gone or reformed, Mossad will no longer be a threat. As we’ve already discussed with MK-Ultra and the multiple individuals successfully brainwashed through it, all they needed was a sad little person who loved video games and was a bit of a recluse to carry out their mission. The FBI should start an investigation into the NSA and the CIA.
Once we fix that, we can move forward as a nation—but until then, there will be no peace. There will be no salvation. Foreign intelligence agencies are nowhere near the threat posed by our own. John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Charlie, and many more—the good ones—were taken out by our own, not by foreign threats.
We need to wake up, or it may already be too late.