If ask me, as great of minds both Spinoza and Eistein were, I would still go with Jesus because He proved He knew a little bit more about how this Universe works. Walking on water, restoring limbs/eyes instantly, raising dead people, and then He Himself getting resurrected with a new body that never dies. He was in the business of restoring life, not blowing it up in atomic explosions.
He most probably knew how to do that too, but he never used those kinds of powers. And when his disciples wanted to use some kind of destructive powers (bring fire from heaven to kill the opposants), he totally forbade them. A totally different vibration, that he is urging us to finally rise up to....
Replied on ARE WE HELPLESS LAB RATS ENTRAPPED IN...
Jan 08 at 10:12 PM
2☆XYLON☆2 For almost half of my life I grew up under a government that made it illegal to possess a Bible. In many parts of the world today that is totally the case still. You risk your life if you are found with a Bible in your possession.
In western world, I would say due to the actual blood of many brave souls that came before us, Bible is available. But not because the "elite" want it to be so. That's so naive. But it is a pity when you see that the "elite" managed to denigrate and discredit the Bible, use it for their evil end goals, up to the point that people have access to it, but we don't have any hearing left to hear what it has to tell us. As I can see, making it illegal is less efficient in preventing people from hearing it, than letting people have it but teach them it all mythology, etc.